On 19-Dec-16 9:59 PM, mechanic wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:50:47 +0000, John Rumm wrote:

On 19/12/2016 11:56, mechanic wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:02:25 +0000, Vir Campestris wrote:

On 17/12/2016 18:42, mechanic wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:47:37 +0000, Vir Campestris wrote:

There have been deaths from the evacuation, just as there would
be from someone falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing
a panic.

You think the evacuation was unnecessary? What would have
happened if there was no evacuation? You think everyone should
return to their homes and get on with their lives as before?

Go on then, HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED BY THE RADIATION?

More relevant to ask how many WILL be killed as a result of
radiation exposure. Some estimate 5000.

So implausible as can be discounted out of hand.

http://www.theecologist.org/News/new...ill_ die.html

Which bases its predictions on the discredited linear no threshold model.

https://www.elsevier.com/connect/5-y...h#human-health

The links from which include information on the benefits of low dose
exposure to radiation.


--
--

Colin Bignell