View Single Post
  #69   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
John Rumm John Rumm is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default Fukushima clear up costs double. AGAIN

On 19/12/2016 17:19, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
harry wrote:

On Monday, 19 December 2016 09:39:12 UTC, John Rumm wrote:
On 19/12/2016 09:09, dennis@home wrote:
On 19/12/2016 09:05, harry wrote:
On Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:02:27 UTC, Vir Campestris wrote:
On 17/12/2016 18:42, mechanic wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:47:37 +0000, Vir Campestris wrote:

There have been deaths from the evacuation, just as there would be
from someone falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a
panic.

You think the evacuation was unnecessary? What would have happened
if there was no evacuation? You think everyone should return to
their homes and get on with their lives as before?

Go on then, HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED BY THE RADIATION?

Harry won't tell us...


Are you so thick you can't find out for yourself?


https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/radiatio...r-still-affect

s-32-million-japanese

Because to admit that the answer is close to zero would not support
his scare story agenda?

Even solar power kills more people per TWh generated than nuclear.


Tens of thousands of lives have been shortened.
If these people had remained near the zone,there would have been more
deaths/lives shortened.
But they were evacuated and given iodine pills.


That's Chernobyl you're thinking of. Where there were no iodine pills
given. And the WHO estimate is up to 4000 lives "shortened". But no one
knows by how much. And that's over a time period when millions will die
of cancer anyway.

So your numbers for Fuk are cock. As usual.


The WHO published some quite detailed reports:

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/.../2005/pr38/en/

"The reports estimate for the eventual number of deaths is far lower
than earlier, well-publicized speculations that radiation exposure would
claim tens of thousands of lives. But the 4000 figure is not far
different from estimates made in 1986 by Soviet scientists, according to
Dr Mikhail Balonov, a radiation expert with the International Atomic
Energy Agency in Vienna, who was a scientist in the former Soviet Union
at the time of the accident."

--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/