"harry" wrote in message
...
On Monday, 19 December 2016 09:39:12 UTC, John Rumm wrote:
On 19/12/2016 09:09, dennis@home wrote:
On 19/12/2016 09:05, harry wrote:
On Sunday, 18 December 2016 21:02:27 UTC, Vir Campestris wrote:
On 17/12/2016 18:42, mechanic wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:47:37 +0000, Vir Campestris wrote:

There have been deaths from the evacuation, just as there would be
from someone falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a
panic.

You think the evacuation was unnecessary? What would have happened
if there was no evacuation? You think everyone should return to
their homes and get on with their lives as before?

Go on then, HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED BY THE RADIATION?

Harry won't tell us...

Andy

Are you so thick you can't find out for yourself?
https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/radiatio...llion-japanese

Because to admit that the answer is close to zero would not support his
scare story agenda?

Even solar power kills more people per TWh generated than nuclear.

Tens of thousands of lives have been shortened.

That claim is straight from your arse, we can tell from the smell.

If these people had remained near the zone, there
would have been more deaths/lives shortened.

Far fewer actually given how many died due to the evacuation.

But they were evacuated

And that killed FAR more than would have died if they hadn't been.

and given iodine pills.