En el artículo ,
newshound escribió:

Slightly lazy journalism I thought

Yes, agreed.

, centred on "lack of primary
containment"

Chernobyl had no primary containment; that incident would have been
nowhere near as bad with PC.

The other point, of course, is that at any time some plant has to be the
"most dangerous"

Aye.

. Quite reassuring that it is 40 years old and unlikely
to continue operating for much longer. Also, not unreasonable for plant
in poorer countries to be built to lower standards

40-year-old standards, yes. At least it'll hopefully not be online much
longer. I couldn't help wondering why they didn't restart reactor 1 as
well.

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) systemd: the Linux version of Windows 10
(")_(")