On 16/12/16 21:31, alan_m wrote:
On 16/12/2016 18:21, harry wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-te...-idUSKBN13Y047

Nuclear is NOT safe or cheap option.


Not when you build the reactor in an earthquake zone.

earthquake didn't touch that reactor. It was a wave 2 meters higher than
designed that dun it.

Even then bugger all radiation got out.

No need to evacuate anyone.