On 16/12/16 15:26, tim... wrote:


"alan_m" wrote in message
...
On 16/12/2016 08:50, harry wrote:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environ...-a7477096.html



Are the costs for storage or an for alternative source for when it's
dark factored in?

I realise that this doesn't allow the claim to be scaled up in the way
harry did

but I think the point of the article was talking about areas where there
was no other means of supply

leccy for 12 hours a day has got to be better than leccy for zero hours
of the day

Not if te main use for it is lighting after dark.
tim




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus