View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
whit3rd whit3rd is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,017
Default Science and the whacko left on supposed Glable Whamming

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 1:36:21 AM UTC-8, Just Wondering wrote:
On 12/13/2016 1:27 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 14/12/2016 3:05 AM, RD Sandman wrote:



... AGW theory is rooted in solid
science and backed by hundreds of years of data.


Hundreds of years of accurate global heat content data do not exit.


Not true; tree ring data, ice cores from Antarctica (and maybe some very
slow glaciers), historical records of (for instance) ice harvests and plant
flowering dates... Heck, regular old mercury thermometers
have been around for three centuries.

There's LOTS of data, certainly more than sufficient to draw a number
of conclusions.

Here's some (page down to the third illustration):
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/whats-difference-between-global-warming-and-climate-change