On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:24:59 -0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 14/12/16 17:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:57:45 -0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 14/12/16 00:48, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 19:14:13 -0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 13/12/16 20:44, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 04:22:08 -0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 13/12/16 00:59, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:48:57 -0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 12/12/16 21:51, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 06:39:18 -0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 12/12/16 02:11, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:07:56 -0000, Fredxxx
wrote:


Is this a royal statement? I'm not on 10.

That's because you're a ****ing useless luddite. Why would you
not
take
a FREE upgrade to a better OS?

Who told you it was better? Microsft?

Bless!

No, I find it easier to use.

Well thats true. it is designed for simpletons.

No one with intelligence uses it.

The advertisements for it make that abundantly clear

No, you're referring to MacOS.

No, that's for stupid rich people.

MacOS is free.

No, it isn't. You need to spend at least £400 on a computer to get it.

****.

Funny, I've built quite a few PCs running it, Apple got no money from me
whatsoever.

Ah. So you are a criminal as well?

About as much as people who download mp3s, yes. I think you'll find
most people ignore copyright.

well most people dont actually.

Only criminal scum like you

No, I'd say about 90%. Then there's all the other laws nobody cares about, like speeding.

--
To snip or not to snip that is the question,
Whether 'tis nobler for the index finger to cut the verbosity and gobbledegook of nutters
or to append a meaningless comment and demonstrate their shallowness.