'Star in a Jar' Fusion Reactor Works and Promises Infinite Energy
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:14:39 -0000, Tim Streater wrote:
In article . com,
dennis@home wrote:
On 12/12/2016 22:59, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:44:57 -0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:
On 12/12/16 21:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:41:49 -0000, Tim Streater
wrote:
In article , James Wilkinson Sword
wrote:
Well somebody must think it's going to work to put money into it.
If it could be made to work it would solve our energy problems at a
stroke. But even confining the plasma has proved difficult. And getting
more energy out than goes in to run it even harder.
Yet they claim to have passed a major hurdle.
The world is full of claims.
This one has had money injected into it by people who believe in it.
Stop being such a silly luddite. Are you the guy that wrote: "Computers
in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." -- Popular Mechanics, 1949?
That prediction has become true.
Perhaps Mr Blunt Sword can tell us what the "major hurdle" is that has
been passed.
PS - Note to Bluntie: if you quote technical or scientific stuff from a
****bag "Elvis seen on Mars" website you must expect derision.
I expected discussion, perhaps I should have chosen a group with more intelligence.
--
I never would have married you if I knew how stupid you were!" shouted the woman to her husband.
The husband replied, "You should've known how stupid I was the minute I asked you to marry me!"
|