On 12/10/2016 11:08 AM, dpb wrote:
On 12/10/2016 10:57 AM, philo wrote:
On 12/10/2016 10:28 AM, dpb wrote:
On 12/10/2016 10:12 AM, philo wrote:

...
[big snip for brevity but imposed environmental reg's]

but what the hell, why not err on the side of caution?

How about shooting for "happy medium" instead of crippling whole
sections of economy for no demonstrable gain?
...
yep... I agree

Which seems diametrically opposed to previous postings.

In all the years I've been posting you have only now realized that on my
politically oriented posts I have come here simply to argue.

I'll perhaps take one side , then after a while take an opposite stance.


Even though I don't have anything of value to say, I'm getting a good
education in the process.

Even though I tend to take the opposite view from most of the people
here...with the possible exception of a few who have been in my killfile
for many years most here (not including myself of course) are pretty
bright.