On Tuesday, 6 December 2016 19:16:24 UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Monday, 5 December 2016 11:21:09 UTC, John Rumm wrote:
On 05/12/2016 11:05, whisky-dave wrote:
On Friday, 2 December 2016 21:54:11 UTC, John Rumm wrote:
On 02/12/2016 12:22, whisky-dave wrote:
On Friday, 2 December 2016 11:42:21 UTC, John Rumm wrote:

It's a con that you've fallen for as most people have to.

There is a fairly simple concept in law, that you can't bind a
third party to the terms of a contract that they have not signed
and have not even seen.

Who's the 3rd party ?

If you bought a Sony TV from Currys, then Sony would be a 3rd party.

No they wouldn't

What else could they be?

the first pary

Not with a CONTRACT.

what contract ?


the 2nd would be the shop where you brought it.

You're talking about how the item gets to the consumer, not the CONTRACT.

what contract ?


You are not Sony, and Currys are not Sony. The only contract that would
be created is between you and Currys, so Sony would not be a party to
the contract.

currys would if the TV needed repair.

Again, nothing to do with the CONTRACT.

what contract ?