"Graham." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 00:58:16 +0000, RayL12
wrote:

On 04/12/2016 4:56 PM, RJH wrote:
On 04/12/2016 16:42, Graham. wrote:
On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:15:27 +0000, Tim Watts
wrote:

On 04/12/16 16:10, Graham. wrote:
I didn't capture what happened between DSCF7217 & DSCF7218 but we all
heard the crash. The two guys were perched up there when it happened
and seemed to continue as if nothing had happened.
https://www.flickr.com/gp/g3zvt/4RR2U8
The property owners don't seem to be home. It's getting dark and they
are cementing the bricks back. Oh wait they've got some tiles.

I'll keep you posted.

That's a rancid knackered stack! I do not know why they ar epatching
it
up - it wants taking off and rebuilding from scratch...




It's 1639, Manchester and little more than a crescent moon to see by.
They are still up there, presumably trying to make good the damage
before the owner returns.


Judging by some roofing work I had done recently, a good few days making
those tiles good. And that's assuming they know what they're doing . . .



Yikes! Makes me shiver to see how they work. The same way I did. I hated
those f***in Rosemary tiles. They can look quite strong from above but
the damage occurs on the underside. Sometimes to the extent that a
finger could be pushed through the top surface to find the body of the
tile none existent.

I have dealt with bad stacks but I would have walked away from that.


...Ray.

Here is a closeup I took in 2014
https://www.flickr.com/gp/g3zvt/7yd0t3

What would be the recommended way of taking it down?

Brick by brick with a runway to slide the bricks down
one at a time with sides so the brick cant come off it.