"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Monday, 5 December 2016 11:21:09 UTC, John Rumm wrote:
On 05/12/2016 11:05, whisky-dave wrote:
On Friday, 2 December 2016 21:54:11 UTC, John Rumm wrote:
On 02/12/2016 12:22, whisky-dave wrote:
On Friday, 2 December 2016 11:42:21 UTC, John Rumm wrote:

It's a con that you've fallen for as most people have to.

There is a fairly simple concept in law, that you can't bind a
third party to the terms of a contract that they have not signed
and have not even seen.

Who's the 3rd party ?

If you bought a Sony TV from Currys, then Sony would be a 3rd party.

No they wouldn't

What else could they be?

the first pary

Not with a CONTRACT.

the 2nd would be the shop where you brought it.

You're talking about how the item gets to the consumer, not the CONTRACT.

You are not Sony, and Currys are not Sony. The only contract that would
be created is between you and Currys, so Sony would not be a party to
the contract.

currys would if the TV needed repair.

Again, nothing to do with the CONTRACT.