On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:49:09 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote:

On 12/2/2016 9:44 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:41:54 -0600, #NoDAPL wrote:

On 12/2/2016 9:26 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:06:57 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:59:49 +0000, Stormin' Norman
wrote:

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL
wrote:

http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/

ouch!

Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make
one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have
overwhelming national popular support.

No it means Trump does not have "big city" support.
Democrats win the welfare vote hands down.
When you take money from Peter to pay Paul you will always have Paul's
support.

Possibly you can cite a post election demographic study that verifies
your assertion?

Everything I have seen so far indicates that Clinton voters, in
general, had attained higher levels of education and were more
affluent than Trump voters.


educ is hillary has more phds and a slight edge, income is pretty even
(more mid class?) Trumps mid class tends to have more $.

but that is from a NYT poll. might not mean ****

Citation?


oh now he wants a link? go fetch.

Yes, a citation. If you are going to assert something and attribute
it to a particular source, it is logical and reasonable to provide a
citation so others can determine the veracity of your claims.

Without a citation, your assertion is just so much smoke.