On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:35:05 -0600, #NoDAPL
wrote:

On 12/2/2016 8:22 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:08:50 -0600, #NoDAPL
wrote:

On 12/2/2016 7:59 AM, Stormin' Norman wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:57:20 -0600, #NoDAPL
wrote:

http://time.com/4587158/clinton-lead...million-votes/

ouch!

Even if she ends up with a 10 million vote margin, it will not make
one bit of difference beyond illustrating that Trump does not have
overwhelming national popular support.


I've heard the final count is est. around 3 mill. good time article.


See my comment above.


did u read the article? You Know it's effecting the Trump fragile
thought processes. He's already tried to poo poo it on twitter.

Here is a novel idea, if you wish to convey a particular point, why
don't you do that instead of hoping others will read the articles you
post and divine the same meaning and significance as you?


is it my imagination? seems people comment on what's on their mind when
they click my posts? reading adverse? do you guys read at all?

With all due respect, of course people comment about what's on their
minds! If you wish to steer the discourse, you should personally
compose a narrative and include that in your post.

The artsy fartsy approach of the liberal mind set, expecting others to
be mind readers and not presenting your own, cogent and pithy thoughts
in your posts is tantamount to setting yourself up for disappointment
and scorn.