View Single Post
  #23   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Dave Plowman (News) Dave Plowman (News) is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default Charging battery in situ

In article ,
wrote:
On Friday, 25 November 2016 00:33:34 UTC, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 24 November 2016 16:22:57 UTC, Brian Gaff wrote:
"Bertie Doe" wrote in message
...
The boss in local battery centre says it's ok to connect neg
charger lead to neg terminal on battery.

However, car's user manual suggests connecting to somewhere on
the chassis. This can be a pain, getting a good connection. Any
thoughts TIA.



I don't see the reason for using the chassis unless testing the
earth, but you don't need a charger for that!


I persume the idea is to reduce current if anything shorts, thus
avoiding fire.


With a battery charger? Don't think even the very cheapest I've ever
seen was devoid of some form of protection against shorts.


That of course offers no protection against the leads wearing through
and shorting.


Really? Why would that be?

But then most with sense wouldn't use anything where 'the leads had worn
through'


NT


--
*Why is the time of day with the slowest traffic called rush hour?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.