On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 12:50:40 PM UTC-5, Sterling Archer wrote:
Kurt V. Ullman formulated on Thursday :
On 11/24/16 12:11 PM, Sterling Archer wrote:
Kurt V. Ullman has brought this to us :


You assert your invisible friends exist and use them as the basis for
influencing public policy. I simply ask for empirical evidence of the
existence of your invisible friends, there is nothing unreasonable about
my request.

The original fallacy is to assume things not in evidence. I merely commented
that your belief was based in faith as much as any Christians since you
couldn't prove yours any more than they could prove theirs. MY feelings
either way was not made.

Without empirical evidence, your assertions are little more than hearsay
at best, or delusions, mental illness and bold faced lies at worst.
And thus we get further evidence of the intolerance that is equal to
fundamentalists of any faith.

Only a theist would refer to the scientific method as being
"intolerant". Produce the empirical evidence and I will happily accept
your assertions as being factual. Absent evidence, your claims are no
more than fantasy.

+1