On Tuesday, 8 November 2016 10:09:54 UTC, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 08/11/16 08:42, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
harry wrote:

On Monday, 7 November 2016 17:40:32 UTC, rick wrote:
On 07/11/2016 09:31, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


http://utilityweek.co.uk/news/sta-ca...-intervention-

for-solar/1287152

Without extra subsidies, solar is dead.

I think the idea of subsidising farmers to stop growing crops and put
in PV arrays is absurd.

It is.
PV arrays should be on roof tops & similar structures.

There shouldn't be *any* PV arrays in this country. We're too far north
for it to make any sense.

AS long as I don't have to subsidise harry, I don't care how many solar
panels he puts on his hovel.

I have issues with the money he makes at my expense though.


I have issues with the hidden/postphoned costs of nuclear power.
And the unknowables.