On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:52:20 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 10:19:38 -0000, whisky-dave
wrote:
On Friday, 4 November 2016 01:52:52 UTC, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 08:00:57 -0000, Bod
wrote:
On 03/11/2016 01:29, Rod Speed wrote:


"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:58:07 -0000, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:19:19 -0000, Bod
wrote:
On 02/11/2016 19:08, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 19:03:44 -0000, Bod
wrote:
On 02/11/2016 18:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:17:13 -0000, Bod
wrote:

On 02/11/2016 10:46, bm wrote:
"Chris Green" wrote in message
...
In uk.d-i-y Brian Gaff wrote:

I'd suggest they all have pictures of naked ladies on
their shirts and
that
will probably be allowed as its not an advert.

FIFA's reason (or not) is that the poppy is a religious
symbol, nothing to do with it being an advert or not.

The question is whether their seeing the poppy as a
religious symbol
is correct. Banning such symbols on the football field
does make
sense.

It's simple really, just ban football for the stupidity
it is.
Better still, ban all intolerant people.

If you did that, nudity must be allowed.

Naked footballers?

Nudity everywhere. If you're tolerant, you don't mind naked
folk.
In public I object, just like any decent person would.

That makes you intolerant, and you said intolerance should be
banned. And how can anyone object to the natural state of our own
bodies?

When the natural state is incredibly ugly or hilarious like
yours.

Only to you.

Even sillier than you usually manage.

I don't have problem seeing an ugly person naked.

More fool you.

I wouldn't have sex with them,

Yeah, that microdick stops you doing that.

but just seeing something that isn't beautiful is not a problem.

It is when they are obscenely ugly with
sagging tits half way down to the ground.

Not to mention incontinent folk and women with heavy periods, STDs
etc. Peter is insane!

And you're a silly prude that belongs in the Victorian ages. Why
are you ashamed of the human body?

maybe he thinks that looking at your naked body would send him into
a fit of laughter not the sort of thing you want at funerals or
doing teh shopping it's disctracting.

Funny how when I went to a nudist beach there were people all the way
from really fat and ugly to absolutely gorgeous, and nobody was
laughing or raping each other.

Oh! I remember that email. You scrounged a ride and a few weeks in France
whilst you were signing on the dole. Sponging ****: Dark days.

Yes, the clocks went back.

You said "The lifeguard was totally naked"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You were very excited by the sight of a naked man.

He was particularly well constructed. One of them had an eight inch flaccid wanger. God knows what size it was when erect.

--
Peter is in the top three most intelligent people -- Ron Tompkins, circa 2013.