In article ,
pamela wrote:
On 08:29 31 Oct 2016, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

In short, science is a *model* that can never be proved to be
*true*, it is inductive logic, and depends for its validity on
*never being proved false*. The second string to the
Anti-Science Lefty****'s bow, is the 'precautionary principle'
which says that since we can't *guarantee* things will be OK, we
should not do things at all!


Turnip, there must be a cod-philosophy group where you can debate
such abstract and irrelevant ideas. Why don't you post that pap
there?

Soon you'll invoke Godel's Incompleteness Theorem to show climate
change can't be proven from climate change data alone. Sigh.

Wonder if he's a Jehovah's Witness? In that they seem to believe the ****e
they speak too? With the same passion?

--
*How many roads must a man travel down before he admits he is lost? *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.