View Single Post
  #229   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
James Wilkinson Sword James Wilkinson Sword is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,373
Default Samsung SSD 750 EVO v 850 EVO / Ubuntu

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 00:11:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 22:38:11 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 07:02:15 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 19:27:45 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Bod" wrote in message
...
On 15/10/2016 09:44, alan_m wrote:
On 15/10/2016 01:23, David Paste wrote:
am I barking up the
wrong tree to assume an SSD will improve the snappiness of the
user
interface?)


When I replaced a traditional hard disk in my 5 year old laptop
with
a
SSD I noticed a faster start up but for day to day use no overall
difference in speed.

Hmm! that hasn't been my experience. I've changed several laptops to
SSDs
and *everything* is much snappier.

Only with the laptops that dont have enough physical memory.

Bull****.

We'll see...

My desktop has 32GB and the SSD still makes an enormous difference.

Not to anything except the time to start from a full reboot and
with launching apps that are very disk intensive when starting.

Or when in use.

There are **** all of those that most use much.

Anyone with even half a clue only reboots every few months and doesnt
close apps at all.

I only have open the apps I'm using.

More fool you.

It's tidier.

Its stupid.

Why have more clutter on the taskbar?

Makes no difference what so ever to the taskbar when you use
that properly as where you start apps that you use much.


I use about 20 programs, and about 5 in one day. Stupid to leave all 20
open.


Not when you have enough physical memory so the system doesnt swap.

Only a fool like you closes them so it has to wait for them
to open again, particularly with the slowest opening apps.


I've explained this already - if you have enough physical memory not to swap, then if you closed the program, it would be in the disk cache in memory anyway, and still open fast. I have 32GB RAM, and the 2nd and subsequent times I open any program after the last reboot, they appear instantaneously, with zero disk access.

--
Love is complicated machinery.
But sometimes all you need is a good screw to fix it.