On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 07:09:54 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

On 23/10/2016 01:56, Johnny B Good wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:11:19 +0100, Mike Tomlinson wrote:

En el artÃ*culo , pamela
escribió:

He sees the SSD presenting itself through a logical representation
behind which all essential activities take place hidden and without
any user influence.

It does, but not to the extent of recognising partitions are
mis-aligned and fixing it. For that to happen, the firmware on the
SSD would have to be partition table and filesystem aware, one level
up from being a block device (looking to the host machine like a box
of LBAs labelled from 0 to n, where n is the last available block.)

I see he's getting a beating on another thread about, of all things,
rocket science.

JOOI, which newsgroup? :-)

Took me a while to find it as well... its in this one hanging off the
bottom of one of harry's threads called "OT Solar energy generated in
the UK.overtook coal last Summer"

That was one of the many threads I set to "ignore" (with 300 odd post a
day to this NG being typical, you have to be pretty discerning about what
threads to follow.

Thanks to Mike's link to the google group's copy, I did manage to find
the sub-thread. I didn't see much of an interchange, possibly on account
of the way google groups represents the threading. However, what I did
see was enough to show TNP's complete lack of understanding of rocketry
so basically on a par with his knowledge of the theory and practice of
telecommunications then.

--
Johnny B Good