"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
"John Williamson" wrote in message
...
On 19/10/2016 18:09, Norman Wells wrote:
"John Williamson" wrote in message
...

And in the case of church bell ringing, the action is more likely to
be writing a letter to the complainant telling them 3oplitely they are
mistaken than anything else.

The law is that they have to investigate it, properly and impartially.
They can be held to account if they don't.

And the result will almost certainly be that there is no statutory
nuisance from bell ringing.

And your reason for saying that is what exactly?

Proper and impartial investigation does not mean the complaint is
automatically upheld. Maybe you need to just knock your head against the
wall until that idea sinks into whatever it is you are attempting to use
as a brain.

If it's noise that's complained about, someone will be along in a minute
to measure it with a meter, and a watch to measure its duration. If it's
loud enough and long enough, it will be a Statutory Nuisance. There's no
real getting away from that.

How odd that NOT ONE example of any church which uses its bells to
inform their god botherers that its time to show up at that den of inequity
and grovel to some god or other has EVER been ordered to stop doing
that when some prat like you has shown up where that has been going on
for centurys and has made a complete prat of themselves whining about that.