On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 13:44:11 UTC+1, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:16:29 -0700 (PDT), whisky-dave
wrote:

On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 12:55:33 UTC+1, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 03:29:19 -0700 (PDT), whisky-dave
wrote:


Have fun listing even a single example of that ever being successful.

And even you should have noticed that that
legislation is more than 25 years old now.

2nd link didn't paste in previous reply.

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/socia...ears-1.1535206

You are aware that Dublin is the Capital of a foreign country and will
not be subject to UK legislation.


So you missed the "Have fun listing even a single example of that ever being successful"


Which was said with

" And even you should have noticed that
legislation is more than 25 years old now written below it."

not sure what that has to do with it.


I've had fun now.
Why didn;t he say the incident had to happen within two feet of his arse ?

Because most people will realise the discussion in a Newsgroup
prefixed UK and mentioning legislation and laws will regard the one
appertain to the UK to be the ones that matter to the debate without
feeling the need to clutch at the straw of searching worldwide to find
a supporting point.

Dublin world wide yeah sure.
OK then
..

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...int-noise.html

What the excuse this time it's the dailymail ?

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/316...y-church-bells

is somerset close enough.


and for the record I don't agree with silencing such things when you move in to the area that has them.