On Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:55:21 UTC+1, Norman Wells wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
"Tim Streater" wrote in message
.. .
In article , Norman Wells
wrote:

"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...

Nothing enlightened about prats like you that are actually stupid
enough to show up where churches have been ringing bells for
centurys and try to get them to stop doing that and get the
authoritys who have been stupidly given the responsibly to
consider the complaints prats like you make, tell you to shove your
complaint where the sun don€št shine in appropriate bureaucratic language.

If you don't like what Parliament enacted 26 years ago, you can of course
complain.

In the meantime, the law applies as is.

And church bells keep ringing, even tho it isnt even possible
to avoid being a nuisance to someone when they are rung.

You get to like that or lump it.

Only until a complaint is made by someone with a pair who is willing to take
the bell ringers on. And it surely can't be long delayed in view of the
arrogance you display that is shared by most of them.

Ha ha ha, no, it's arseholes like you who are the arrogant ones.

The law, nevertheless, is on the side of those who suffer noise nuisance, not
those causing it.

Like hell it is when NOT ONE church has had to stop ringing its bells in 26 years.

Several have actually. It's just that when push comes to shove bellringers are
suddenly inclined to compromise, and those who have complained, being the jolly
reasonable souls that they are, have setlled the matter and allowed the bell ringing
to proceed

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/socia...ears-1.1535206