On 18/10/16 11:08, Norman Wells wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
"Indy Jess John" wrote in message
...

"Custom and Practice" as a phrase carries weight when part of a
legal argument.

Only in connection with employment contracts.

Wrong, as always.

Care to find some examples outside employment law? Otherwise, your
argument carries no weight whatsoever.

YOU made the claim.

YOU get to substantiate that claim.

THAT'S how it works.

You can't then.

Thought so.
I've already stated that footpaths and rights of way and indeed land
ownership are all heavily based on 'the way its always been' or 'customs
and use'



--
The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all
private property.

Karl Marx