"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...

Churches can ring bells, but only if they ensure that the noise does not create
a nuisance.

Not possible to ensure that. By definition church bells have
to be heard from a long distance away from the church.

By what 'definition'?

Quote it.

Retake English 101, you clearly slept thru it the first time.

No answer then?

By the way, the plural of 'century' is 'centuries', not 'centurys'. Using the
latter just displays your ignorance.

Churches are however allowed to continue to ring their
bells and are even allowed to add new bells and even
get really radical and add bells to churches which do
not have them too.

Of course they can. If they create a nuisance, however, they will have the law
to deal with.

Nope, the law will tell prats like you to shove your complaint
where the sun don’t shine in suitably bureaucratic language.

Not so.

Fraid so.

It gives a specific right to complain and for that complaint to be investigated
properly.

And in reality the law will tell prats like you to shove your complaint
where the sun don’t shine in suitably bureaucratic language.

No, the law doesn't work like that in England. You see, it's the courts who decide
here, not the petty provincial backwoods bureaucrats you seem to deal with.

It's called progress.

Yours is called bull****.

No, it's called enlightenment.

Its called pig ignorant bull**** by anyone with even half a clue.

If you disagree with my summary of the legal position, go away and read the
law.

Been doing that since before you were even born, thanks.

Not, it seems, with much success.

Wrong, as always.

And know what the authoritys will do with a complaint
from a prat like you about church bells too.

Yes, they'll tell you to go away and learn what the plural of 'authority' is.