On 17/10/2016 22:08, Norman Wells wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
"Norman Wells" wrote in message
...

Why? If the law says I can complain about a nuisance, who are
you to
say otherwise?

Someone who realises you should be allowed to
complain about what has been allowed for centurys.

Quite, no one complained about slavery for centuries as well.

That didn’t change because a prat like Norman complained,
it changed when the law was changed.

Yes, the law is a great instrument of social change when required.

It is the only viable instrument for that.

The Environmental Protection Act is just another example.

A useless one. If it is considered by the parliament that
churches should no longer be allowed to ring any bells,
that should have been explicitly stated in that legislation.

Churches can ring bells, but only if they ensure that the noise does not
create a nuisance.

Now you are not allowed to create a noise nuisance just because you
always have.

Churches are however allowed to continue to ring their
bells and are even allowed to add new bells and even
get really radical and add bells to churches which do
not have them too.

Of course they can. If they create a nuisance, however, they will have
the law to deal with.

It's called progress.

Yours is called bull****.

No, it's called enlightenment.

If you disagree with my summary of the legal position, go away and read
the law.

Rod knows the law, and whenever he loses an argument he abuses those who
enlighten him of things he rather not hear.