On 17/10/2016 20:07, Bod wrote:
On 17/10/2016 19:46, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 17/10/16 14:12, Bod wrote:
On 17/10/2016 13:46, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 17/10/16 13:37, Clive George wrote:
On 15/10/2016 15:03, David wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:51:41 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 15/10/16 10:33, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
snip

Faster booting, faster program load and, if memory is short faster
access to swap if that's on the SSD (although if you want to wear
out an
SSD, using it for swap is one of the best ways).
snip

Just pondering on SSDs and Swap.

If you have a system with just an SSD then what do you use as swap?

Assuming that you don't (as in most laptops and older desktops) have
the
space for masses of memory?

"Most laptops"? 8G and 16G on the laptops in use here :-)

For some years now I've made sure no system I have anything to do with
is running into swap.


Nice if you can afford the luxury....

Guess how much RAM gridwatch runs on, and how much swap it has?


How much?

384Mbyte

Think there's a gig of swap.

People often think they need more ram than they actually do.

So next question : is TNP's system running into swap? I'd expect it to
not have to. If it's not, then it seems that TNP can indeed "afford the
luxury" of a system not using its swap.

(I do get irritated by eg database software installs which complain that
your swap file is too small. Yes, it's tiny, but that's not a problem
because the server has 60G of memory...)