On 16/10/16 16:52, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
On 12:46 16 Oct 2016, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
I've been an electronic engineer and a comoputer systems
professional for bloody years.
And you still manage to know **** all. Impressive. You're a proto-
Wodney.
I happen to have done a
lot of research on SSDS
bull****.
beyond reading some urban legend on the
net
what Intel says is urban legend?
http://www.intel.co.uk/content/dam/w...ents/technolog
y-briefs/ssd-partition-alignment-tech-brief.pdf
It may have been true 4 years ago for a crappy intel SSD on windows, but
that is not the case now
Prick.
, and that is what forms the basis for what I say. If I don't
have good knowledge I generally don't respond at all.
Bull****. You're all over this NG like a rash with your uninformed
opinions which are mostly wrong, a lot of hand-waving about how clever
you think you are.
I think you have been looking into a mirror again Wodney
:-)
You post a lot; there is the occasional nugget but most of it is the
nuggets that drop out of your arse.
This was drawn with idiots like you in mind: https://xkcd.com/386/
plonk
--
it should be clear by now to everyone that activist environmentalism
(or environmental activism) is becoming a general ideology about humans,
about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and
the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a
'noble' idea. It is not an honest pursuit of 'sustainable development,'
a matter of elementary environmental protection, or a search for
rational mechanisms designed to achieve a healthy environment. Yet
things do occur that make you shake your head and remind yourself that
you live neither in Joseph Stalins Communist era, nor in the Orwellian
utopia of 1984.
Vaclav Klaus