View Single Post
  #66   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Mike Tomlinson Mike Tomlinson is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,069
Default Samsung SSD 750 EVO v 850 EVO / Ubuntu

En el artículo , The Natural Philosopher
escribió:

No, what I am saying


.... is a load of irrelevant bull****. Stop wriggling. We're talking
about partition alignment as it applies to SSDs. You're moving the
goalposts (as usual).

You really do not have a clue. Read up on flash memory erase block
sizes, then you will see why you're full of ****. You postill-informed
opinion, not facts, and expect people to take it as gospel.

Here's a link to get you started.

https://flashdba.com/2014/06/20/unde...cks-pages-and-
program-erases/

As usual, you're right and firms like Intel and the major SSD
manufacturers are wrong.

http://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/u...te-drives/ssd-
partition-alignment-tech-brief.html

You need to have a read of this too:

http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/12/24/how-it-works-the-com.html

* awaits swivel-eyed loony response *

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) systemd: the Linux version of Windows 10
(")_(")