"Algeria Horan" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 13:38:58 +1100, Gordon Levi wrote:

That is not a fact! If you ask anybody at The U.S. Department of
Transportation that "is leading the effort to stop texting and cell
phone use behind the wheel" you will find that _none_ of them believe
that a WWII Bomber _was_ found on the moon.

The reason for bringing out the WWII Bomber sophistry was to forestall the
inevitable unbelievable response which already came out of the mouth of
Rod
Speed for the *reason* that the reliably compiled accident record in both
the US and in Australia shows *none* of the accident rates predicted by
the
dire "cellphone distraction" models many people subscribe to.

You can keep repeating that bare faced lie till you are blue in the
face if you like, it stays a bare face lie, you silly little pathological
liar.

The reason for the high-octane example of sophistry + intensification was
to
illustrate that we, the reader, must accurately parse all the stated
references,
so that we don't fall prey to artificial intensification based sophistry.

For example, nobody has ever yet ever produced a single reliable document,
which, when accurately parsed by an intelligent reader, shows *any*
relationship, in the real world, between cellphone use and accident rates!

You haven't produced even one that shows that there isnt.

The only readers who believe such evidence exists are those who fall prey
to
the sophistry that I tried to illustrate with the high-octane examples.

There's a very deep message here,

Nope, a very obvious one, that you are a bare
faced pathological liar/pathetic excuse for a troll.

if you want to understand what I'm saying,

Nothing to understand with your **** except that you are
a bare faced pathological liar/pathetic excuse for a troll.

and that message is all about the fact that some people jump to
conclusions
that are NOT based on the facts, but which merely reinforce their
intuition.

Says he after doing just that with the statistics on what
happens with drivers STOPPED AT TRAFFIC LIGHTS etc.

Those who look at facts

None of the **** you cited does anything of the sort with relevant facts.

have never found any meaningful relationship between cellphone use

THERE ARE NO FACTS ON THE USE OF CELLPHONES WHEN DRIVING AT SPEED.

and accidents in the United States or in Australia.

Because they had no FACTS ON THE USE OF CELLPHONES WHEN DRIVING AT SPEED.