View Single Post
  #54   Report Post  
Posted to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,alt.home.repair
Rod Speed Rod Speed is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40,893
Default Does Australia have similar cellphone "related" accident rates as the United States

Algeria Horan wrote
Rod Speed wrote


talking to someone sitting next to you is exactly
the same as talking to someone through a phone.


Even sillier than you usually manage. The difference is that when
you are talking to someone sitting next to you, that other person
will usually have enough of a clue to stop talking when they see
that you are about to run into something or run a little kid over etc.


The difference between you and me is that you seem to trust your intuition


That observation has absolutely NOTHING to do with intuition, it is a fact.

more than you do facts,


More of your bare faced lies.

whereas I clearly trust facts more so than I trust my intuition.


You wouldn’t know what a real fact was if it bit you
on your lard arse, you pathetic excuse for a lying troll.

(Myers-Briggs stuff)


More of your bare faced lies, you pathetic excuse for a lying troll.

I quoted a fact from a published paper


And lied thru your ****ing teeth about the relevance
of that fact to what was being discussed.

(albeit, all papers have to be properly *parsed*,


Read and comprehended, actually.

because science is all about the details


And you just ignored the inconvenient FACT that those numbers
are completely useless because they ONLY recorded what
happened when the driver was STOPPED AT THE LIGHTS etc.

- and in vitro science


That paper isnt in vitro science.

is particularly dangerous due to the
potential to mis-parse the details).


Nothing whatever to do with parsing, you
pathetic excuse for a lying bull**** artist.

I also quoted a fact from the NHTSA statistical report.


And that statistical report doesn’t even report what you
claimed it was reporting on, you silly little pathological liar.

My opinion comes directly from *those* facts.


Which are completely irrelevant to what was being discussed.

Where'd you get your opinion from?


That at the top isnt an opinion, it’s a FACT.

HINT: Without a reputable cite,


Don’t need one for that FACT. And that isnt a hint either,
its just more of your pathetic excuse for bull****/trolling.

please do not respond because we
know the answer already anyway.


More of your bare faced pathological lying.

So respond only after you dig up a cite that supports your view.


Go and **** yourself, again. You get no say what so ever on anything I do.