En el artículo , Chris Hogg
escribió:

They continue with the misleading publicity for the output of the
proposed Cardiff scheme, claiming it will be 3,000MW, when in reality
this output will only occur for a limited period at peak tidal flow,
and averaged over a year the output will be a fifth of that, something
like 600MW. And it will be intermittent, on-off-on-off etc. four times
a day

Something like this would seem to be a better solution: cheaper, doesn't
block the bay, constant power, presumably lower impact on the
environment (if it doesn't do a Chernobyl). One issue would be a
transmission uplink to the grid which would still need to be built.

https://www.rt.com/news/361908-lomonosov-fnpp-russia-platform/

This caught my eye though: 300MWt and 75MWe. 25% efficiency? Seems
very low. What about primary containment, and corrosion caused by
seawater?

Mo http://www.okbm.nnov.ru/english/lomonosov

Some controversy in Russia about it:

http://bellona.org/news/nuclear-issu...-says-russias-
floating-nuke-plant-must-be-smaller

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) systemd: the Linux version of Windows 10
(")_(")