On 10/6/2016 8:16 AM, Bod wrote:
On 06/10/2016 12:57, Meanie wrote:
On 10/6/2016 4:43 AM, T wrote:
On 10/06/2016 12:59 AM, Bod wrote:

We don't need that ****. Why do you carry a weapon, is it because
Americans have small cocks?


What an idiot. You know nothing about us. But that does
not stop you from making stupid condescending statements
and twisting facts.

Clean your own socialist toilet country up before
tell other how to fix theirs.

Erm..... we have a Conservative government and they are right wing.
Heavier prison sentences are going to be brought in for knife crime.

That is a good start. Any sign of them undoing any
socialized programs? As I listen to your news, they
just make the programs work a little better. You
are still a socialist toilet. Just one that is run a
little better.

Good news on the knife front. Murder is murder, no
matter how you kill a person



Murder should result in execution. I cannot understand why any tax
paying citizen would want to contribute to the care of a lifetime
prisoner.

Whatever country it is, they all spend our money foolishly.


As I understand it, in the US it costs far more to have a murderer on
Death Row than to incarcerate the person for life. The average convicted
murderer spends 20 years on Death Row.

To execute or not: A question of cost? - US news - Crime & courts ...
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29552692/n...question-cost/

7 Mar 2009 - States discover it's cheaper to imprison killers for life
than to execute them ... alive," though most Americans believe the
opposite, said Donald McCartin, a former ... system, which produces an
average wait of nearly 20 years from conviction to fatal ... It costs
more to house death row inmates, who are held in ...

The primary reasons for high cost are due to the appeals process which
is why they remain on death row for decades. Appeals process cost tax
dollars and of course, so does incarceration. A swift execution after
one allowed appeal, would resolve that spending.