"Fredxxx" wrote in message
...
On 09/09/2016 13:59, Dan S. MacAbre wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Fredxxx
wrote:
On 09/09/2016 10:20, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 09/09/16 10:04, TimW wrote:
On 09/09/16 07:16, harry wrote:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/09/g...c-state-attack






Harry still trying to spread the word of the criminal and racist right
wing. The author of this one, American loony Robert Spencer,
due to speak at an English Defence League march was banned
from entering the UK by Teresa May. And still is.

To right wing even for the right wing? Get out of here with
your extremist crap Harry.

TW
Harry isn't extremist. You should get out more. There's a lot
weirder opinions than that out there.

Neither is he particularly right wing. Indeed extremist right
wing is largely an invention of the left


To challenge the view that all change is for the better, is to
be labelled as extremist right wing, these days.

Most left wing seem to forget that Hitler was a socialist.

Don't forget North Korea too. And lots of African republics. If
someone calls themselves a socialist or their country one, it must
be so. Just like democratic.

After all, Turnip calls himself a Philosopher. I rest my case.


I think one of the hardest things in history is to try to understand
what people thought of Hitler in the 30's.

That is quite easy. The Great Depression started in 1929 and continued
for most countries until the late 30's.

There were no state benefits payable to anyone who was out of work.

That wasn’t true of Germany or the USA either.

We have also conveniently forgotten who invented and ran the banking
system.

You clearly don’t know who did that.

They were vilified in much the same way bankers are today for the 2007/8
bank bailouts.

'they' were vilified long before the Great Depression.

People lost their life saving and the blame
was firmly placed on bankers at that time.

Not in Germany, it was firmly placed on the
allies that applied draconian reparations.

In those days bankers were not a protected characteristic.

Hitler had various socialist policies.

And other policys like Keynesian deficit spending too.

One of which was a Christian tradition that interest should not be
charged, and that there should be no return on capital; where only labours
were remunerated.

Hitler never ever had any such policy.

If Corbyn adopted those policies, who knows!

On top of that Hitler spent his way out any economic disaster,

Just like FDR did in the US.

the opposite of austerity

Yes, he wasn’t that stupid.

and used the resource to arm Germany.

And do a hell of a lot more than just that too.

I'm sure he considered himself to be something of a socialist, as least
as far as native Germans were concerned.

He was very much a socialist

Yes.

and was voted in on that basis.

Nope. He wasn’t in fact ever voted in. He never had a majority
in the Reichstag and there was never a vote for Chancellor.
Hindenburg APPOINTED him Chancellor.