View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Dave Plowman (News) Dave Plowman (News) is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default OT Got out just in time.

In article ,
whisky-dave wrote:
Of course. Each country wants the very best deal it can get. For itself.


So no trade will ever be done then.


That's why you need skilled negotiators.

Up to the other country to do that too. Which is why, as I keep on
saying, you don't do it with a handshake over a pint. It takes many
years.


and after I think 7 years this has failed I've heard it something
germnay didn't like.


The US trying its usual trick of bullying a settlement, more like.


Which is why the EU has become to large and unfit for the purpose it was
originaly set up for which was to make sure that no single country could
gain the upper hand.


That might make some sense to you, I suppose.

Be interesting to see just how we get on without it if and when we leave.
As the reasons for joining all those years ago are still as valid today as
then.

But at least we'll have 'taken back control' as England sinks down the
world pecking order.

--
*He's not dead - he's electroencephalographically challenged

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.