On 07/08/16 17:57, nospam wrote:
In article , tlvp
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 15:03:21 -0400, Aardvarks wrote:
Your URL simply says that, as I predicted, that Safari is primitive code
that doesn't even support the modern battery-status HTML5 spec which
debuted years ago.

Indeed. Corollary: noone can exploit the battery-status spyware
capabilities using Safari; i.e., Safari (precisely because of its greater
primitivity) is a more secure browser in that regard.

except that it's not more primitive because it shares a common codebase
with android, chrome and opera, just different forks.

By now, they're *very* different forks. There's been
close to zero cross-pollination for some time.

Can you folk please drop sci.electronics.repair from
the newsgroup list? Android v iOS discussions have no
place there.