On 8/4/2016 1:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 8/4/2016 12:38 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 8/4/2016 11:31 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:38:09 -0700, Mike Colangelo wrote:
On 8/3/2016 10:43 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug Just Wondering wrote:
On 8/1/2016 9:52 PM, Governor Swill wrote:
Women are always more responsible, especially about
kids, than men.

If you said generally rather than always, I might agree.
But if what you wrote ("always") was true there would be
fewer abortions,

Getting an abortion is not taking responsibility for a surprise or
unwanted pregnancy?

"taking responsibility" would be not having an unwanted pregnancy in
the
first place.

Which makes men equally liable.

No, not equally. Men don't get pregnant. If a woman doesn't want to
get pregnant, she can either abstain from sex or take contraceptive
measures. The woman always bears the greater responsibility for an
unwanted pregnancy.

None of which negates the idea that if there is an unwanted pregnancy,
both participants are equally liable.

You're stupid. What I wrote *does* negate that there is equal liability.

The responsibility for preventing pregnancy falls heavier on the woman.

It is just mind-boggling that the out-of-wedlock pregnancy and birth
rates got sky-high in the 1970s and 1980s after contraception became
widely and *cheaply* available, and after women became "empowered"
[chortle] following the sexual "revolution". Simply inexcusable.

True, but that also does not negate a man's responsibility
in the matter.

It's not negated, but it's less. Men don't get pregnant.