"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
On 26/07/16 11:01, MKF wrote:


"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
On 26/07/16 08:27, Chris Hogg wrote:
It is entirely a nominal position and in reality carries no executive
powers.
Do you say but then...

As with all the monarch's other 'head of' positions, the
monarch does what they're instructed to do by parliament and/or the
prime minister.

Why, if she has no executive powers, would she need to do this?

Because otherwise she has no purpose at all apart from swanning
around waving at the crowd and opening things and stuff like that.

The Chief of the Defence Staff would run the military,
the Archbishop of Canterbury would run the church, the Prime Minister
would run the country, for as long as he was elected. The judiciary
would still be independent.

Except from the queen.

From the queen too.

Even your house belongs to the Queen.

Like hell it does.

Freehold means you rent it for free....but she still owns it.

Like hell she does. She doesnt own Buck House either.

I see you have as little knowledge of the laww as you do of anything else.

We'll see...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freehold_(law)

Says nothing what so ever about Liz owning everything.

The reality is that if Liz was actually stupid enough to
try taking anything off anyone and giving it to anyone
she liked better, she's get the bums rush so fast her feet
wouldnt even touch the ****ing ground, and she knows it.