On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 10:46:17 AM UTC-4, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 7/7/2016 10:29 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 10:06:56 AM UTC-4, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 7/7/2016 9:37 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:

Well, for a guy who's not offended and not
concerned what I think, you sure ramble on
a lot.

Who said I wasn't concerned with what you think? The mere fact that
I have tried to point out the error in your assumption shows that I
care. That certainly doesn't mean I'm offended. Once again, it's called
"conversation".

Have you considered just taking my
suggestion...

Why would I consider taking a suggestion that doesn't fit the
situation?

You made an incorrect assumption and you made a suggestion based on
that incorrect assumption. All I've tried to do is explain why your
assumption was incorrect. Once again, it's called "conversation".

... and apologizing for wasting so much of your and my time?

Thank you for your concern about my time. I don't feel it's been
wasted, but thanks anyway. As far as *your* time, I can't waste that,
only you can. If you consider this conversation to be a waste of your
time, feel free to stop reading my responses and then responding. Only
you have the power to decide how to spend your time.


Yet another goal post shift. You're flailing
around in the dark trying to get some thing to
stick to me. In this case, it's about me, now,
and wasted time. What a pathetic, failed effort.
I make a simple and correct suggestion, and you
waste endless time trying to establish some false
and goofy assertion about it being my problem.

I bet you do this with other people in your life.
When your doctor tries to write you a prescription,
do you spend the next three days trying to get
your doctor to admit that he's mistaken?


Change of subject noted


Yep, we went from Derby having a conversation
with his kids to Chris and his suggestion.


....to Chris not seeing that his suggestion doesn't
even apply to the situation because it is based on
an incorrect assumption.