On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:29:07 PM UTC-5, T wrote:
On 07/05/2016 08:34 PM, bob_villain wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 8:49:07 PM UTC-5, T wrote:
On 07/05/2016 12:36 PM, bob_villain wrote:
On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 2:25:04 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
On 7/5/2016 3:08 PM, Tekkie® wrote:

I don't know if this has been posted before...

Is the fix in?

What about other people that got prosecuted for the same thing?

What to think?


Obviously the fix was in. Question is will voters recognize this?

Let's face it...the right will never be satisfied...so they'll spend more and more on the investigation. People will see *them* for what they're worth...and it will back-fire on them. Typical scenario...


So, one law for the Left Wing Elites and one law for the rest of us?

Extremely damning, but no penalties recommended...so the voters decide if they think they can trust her.

1. "Extremely careless"
"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."
snip

1/1000 and my bones would be in prison for the next 500 years.

I did my duty and protected our classified information. Everyone
around me did too.

I wonder how many of our sources she got killed. It is no wonder
why our allied won't share information with us anymore!

That unholy hoodlum!

Did you have something to add...you did mention those exaggerations before?