On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 2:08:23 PM UTC-4, Muggles wrote:
On 7/3/2016 12:43 PM, trader_4 wrote:
On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 1:13:51 PM UTC-4, Muggles wrote:
On 7/3/2016 8:40 AM, trader_4 wrote:

satisfied. Like banning smoking even if I want to have a private cigar
dinner at a restaurant once a month. Whatever restrictions there are,
it's never enough, no compromise is possible.

Some things are that important that there should be no compromise.

Sure, no compromise for liberals. That was exactly my point, you won't
stop until you control EVERYTHING we do, because YOU know what is best
for all the rest of us, we have no rights.

Can you just not comprehend the many times that I've come straight out
and said I'm a conservative?

Yeah, Mr. Green here claims to be a Republican too, but he can't find one
Republican, including Reagan that was any good.

Don't complain to me about issues you have with someone else.


Who's complaining. I just pointed to a classic example here of someone
who clearly is not what they claim to be, just like you.


I suspect you're his kind of conservative.

Now, if I'm not "YOU'RE" kind of conservative, then I can't possibly BE
a conservative?? Is that what you believe?


Wooosh! Right over your pin head. The fact is that someone who chooses
people who tell cops to **** off, resist arrest, while condemning the cops,
doesn't sound conservative. Nor someone that thinks it's govt's job to
extinguish every cigarette in America, that people shouldn't be allowed
the freedom to choose for themselves. THAT is what libs do, smoking,
now soda sizes, salt on restaurant tables.



On the smoking issue, clearly the conservative position is
that if you are an adult and you want to have a cigar dinner in a private
room at a restaurant, it's none of the govt's business.

CLEARLY, that is YOUR position, which doesn't automatically fall into a
conservative mindset.

Of course it does. Which once again demonstrates that you don't even
know what conservatives stand for today. Explain to us where in the
Constitution as the framers put it forth, it gives the govt the right
to deny people the right to have a private cigar dinner at a restaurant.
You think Madison would support your position?


In fact, your kind of radical attitude is akin to
how many liberals approach how they respond to anyone they disagree
with. If you don't want people seeing you as being a liberal nutcase,
you need to reassess how you respond.


I'm the radical? Good grief. I support the right of a group of people
to have cigar dinner in a restaurant. YOU are the one that wants to
control people, FORCE your ways on everyone. THAT is what libs do.



If you can't see that, then it sure sounds like you're a lib.

How 'bout you take a flying leap off a short pier into shallow water?
How does that trip your trigger, bubba?


Go **** yourself, how about that. And take that moron Mormon with you.



You don't define what or who constitutes being conservative.


No your words and actions do and tells us all we need to know about
you. Explain to us how banning a cigar dinner in a private room in
a restaurant fits in with being a conservative. You can't. It doesn't.




You also take the side of jerks
who mouth off to cops, refuse to produce ID, resist arrest. You blame the
cops. No, doesn't sound like you're a conservative to me.

Changing the subject? Hey, start a new thread and I'll take you to
school on that topic, too. It's already been discussed "why" I took the
position that I took, and if you can't accept that I'm a conservative
and have an opinion different from your own on 2 topics, then I guess
you'll just be an unhappy camper.


--
Maggie

Yeah, you sure took us to school on that one. But, but, but they were
arrested for JAYWALKING! Wrong, village idiot. They were arrested for
RESISTING arrest which everyone else could see right on the freaking
video. You really are a total waste of protoplasm.