On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 16:16:26 +0100, pamela wrote:

On 15:38 3 Jul 2016, charles wrote:

In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 03/07/16 14:28, charles wrote:
In article ,
alan_m wrote:
On 03/07/2016 13:51, GB wrote:

Also, there were lots of porkies told in the run-up to the
referendum, and these are now being exposed.


Lies on both sides

So, who knows what a second referendum would bring?

That's why it will not happen.

a scond referendum is not needed. The first was only
"advisory" and Parliament will decide what to do.

Parliament already has.

That why Cameron resigned.

Cameron resigned within hours of the referendum result.
Parliament hadn't met to discuss the issue

I tried to explain the situation to TNP but he doesn't seem
interested in any views that don't foresee the full implementation
of Brexit Max.

Unfortunately, TNP sees anyone who doesn't agree with him or believe
what he does as just a 'talking head' ... just a noise to be ignored.

Perhaps he thinks that if he denies the possibility of compromise
that it will somehow change how things turn out.

See above. 'Compromise' isn't actually in his vocabulary'.

Cheers, T i m