On 03/07/16 15:38, charles wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 03/07/16 14:28, charles wrote:
In article ,
alan_m wrote:
On 03/07/2016 13:51, GB wrote:

Also, there were lots of porkies told in the run-up to the referendum,
and these are now being exposed.


Lies on both sides

So, who knows what a second referendum would bring?

That's why it will not happen.

a scond referendum is not needed. The first was only "advisory" and
Parliament will decide what to do.

Parliament already has.

That why Cameron resigned.

Cameron resigned within hours of the referendum result. Parliament hadn't
met to discuss the issue

You don't understand how parliament *really* works do you?

Parliament does what it's told by and large.

Cameron was given his marching orders, and someone will be selected to
protect the interests of TPTB, however those powers have already decided
on brexit.


What is apparent if you look at the detail, is that there is now a
widening gap between commercial interests and the Left. Despite the
mobilisation of the whole Lefty-hate-fear-moral-high-ground machine,
people still voted leave.

The Left and political correctness aren't wooing the voters anymore.

It's probably the beginning of the end for them.



--
"Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They
always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them"

Margaret Thatcher