On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 20:02:02 +0100, Chris Hogg wrote:

On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:46:29 +0100, T i m wrote:

On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:08:48 +0100, dennis@home
wrote:

On 02/07/2016 12:29, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 02/07/16 10:01, Chris Hogg wrote:
they've both fallen foul of a blanket ban due to
manufacturers not submitting data required by EU regulations to
demonstrate that they were safe to use in their particular
applications,


The guiding rule of the EU legal system, if its not specifically
permitted, it is disallowed.

You can stop the lies now, you have won.

Albeit a very hollow, tenuous and as yet unconfirmed, (till article 50
is actually filed) 'win', as '10's of thousands' of people rallying
against the bogus Brexit 'direction' in London today confirm.

So '10's of thousands' of people want to overturn a democratically
arrived-at result,

Yes, when 'trickery' was used to gain that result. If what the Leave
campaign were doing was an advert they would be done by Trading
Standards (*because* it could trick the gullible).

"We send the EU £350M/week" (that in itself is highly questionable,
other than in regard to 'Fees paid to the EU' and 'send' being
'currently pay in').

"Let's fund our NHS *instead*. Vote Leave"

"Let's take back control"

Control of what? Funding the NHS? Immigration?

Any TS officer would see that for what it was, a blatant trick.

http://leftfootforward.org/images/20...7axaaiklxc.jpg

Now, how many of the 4% of the votes that represented the 'majority'
may not have been cast on Leave if that advert wasn't allowed?

and want to continue with what is also an
undemocratic system.

Different discussion.

Totalitarianism rules, OK.

I dunno, does it?

OK, why do you think all those people were protesting? I would be
interested to hear what you think.

Just for the S&G's, try putting yourself on the other side for just a
moment and see if you can see what they might be seeing (seriously).

Cheers, T i m