On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:20:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 30/06/16 15:00, James Wilkinson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:58:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 30/06/16 13:13, James Wilkinson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:42:35 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 30/06/16 01:34, James Wilkinson wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 04:24:23 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 28/06/16 22:22, James Wilkinson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:44:16 +0100, polygonum

wrote:

On 28/06/2016 21:30, James Wilkinson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:24:21 +0100, dennis@home

wrote:

http://www.diabetes.co.uk/news/2016/...-91537224.html






The NHS is a drain on our taxes and should be closed down.

Are you going to fund all your health needs out of your own cash?

Are you going to buy an insurance policy that covers all your
health
needs?

Whichever, have you any idea how much it will cost you in actual
money
terms?

In my entire life, the only thing the NHS fixed for me was a
couple of
broken bones. That's a lot less than my tax contributions to the
NHS.
I would much rather have paid for the bones from my own pocket.

Well so far a double hernia, testicular cancer and two heart
operations,
I think I'm about evens ;-)

So basically I've paid for your testicle problems. You think that's
right?!?

You haven't, because I've paid three times over for all of that.

Why would you have done that?

Because I didn't want to go to court for tax evasion

So you're saying you paid more in than you got out, and you're happy
with that?!?

Someone has to.
*shrug* I chose to live here.
That's the law.

No they don't have to. With no NHS, you'd pay for what you use. That's the only fair way. How would you like all petrol to be free, and you can fund mine?

--
Marriage changes passion. Suddenly you're in bed with a relative.