On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 02:42:19 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"James Wilkinson" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:21:33 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:
"James Wilkinson" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:45:29 +0100, tim...
wrote:
"James Wilkinson" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:05:27 +0100, tim...
wrote:
"James Wilkinson" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:58:16 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:
Nope, you do. Its the povs that are too stupid to do that
or to work out how to get qualified for the decent jobs
that end up in council houses because they are that stupid.
People with enough money don't need to save 50p here and there.
I don't need to save 50p here and there but I still do.
As and example I can afford to get a taxi to/from the airport, but I
still
catch the train because I consider taxi fares to be extortionate
That would be considerably more than 50p.
well yes
but then the train fare is significantly more than 2.50p
I make the decision to bother saving money based on the amount saved and
the time taken to save it.
Me too, and the cost of getting there in the case
of Aldi which currently costs me $10 to get there
and back until they finish building the local one.
I just shop at the supermarkets once every 3 weeks. Less hassle, less
time.
Still makes a lot more sense to have an app tell you what is cheapest at the
ones that you visit
I already know which is cheapest. It's in the spreadsheet.
every 3 weeks than fart around printing out a
spreadsheet,
A few clicks.
scribbling on that, carting that with you when you go shopping.
It's smaller than a phone.
Using apps to mess about working out where and when to shop is far too
much hassle
There is in fact much less hassle involved in scanning the
barcode of the stuff you use the last of and having the app
tell you as you walk in the various supermarkets you visit anyway,
which ones have the best prices for the stuff on your list.
So, I go to the kitchen and get some food, go find my phone,
Dont have to do that if you have enough of a clue to have it in your
pocket.
Why on earth would I want to carry something around with me all day? The only thing I do that with is my watch, which is strapped on. Make a phone that small then I'll do so. Oh wait, phone screens are too small as it is.
go back to the kitchen, scan the item..... ffs.
Much less hassle in fact than your dinosaur approach of
printing out a spreadsheet,
In a few clicks.
marking that up with what
you have decided you need to buy,
It's quicker than scanning.
Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you dont have a clue.
Must be why the shelf stackers in supermarkets all do it your dinosaur way.
Different task entirely.
and buying that stuff
from the place where it was cheapest at one time but
which is unlikely to be the cheapest of the supermarkets
you will be visiting on that shopping run.
Almost all stay the cheapest.
Even sillier than you usually manage.
Nope, just true.
The price is on hte list anyway, so if I happen to see it substantially
more in the shop, I go to another one next time.
Dont need to fart around like that when the app tell you what
is cheapest in that particular supermarket as you walk in.
I only notice it occasionally, as it only happens occasionally. And I don't even have to think about it.
for a few quid here and there.
To save half or more of your total shopping spend in fact
when the app keeps track of how quickly you use stuff auto
and only suggest you buy it when it is half price or better.
**** all is half price here.
That's because you 'live' where the supermarket traffic
is dominated by the council sink estate dregs.
Why would that stop them having half price offers?
Only things that cheap are things with 1 day left on the sellby date.
See above.
No, they do it to avoid throwing out food, because some ****wit EU legislation stops them giving it away to the homeless once it's past the date and allegedly toxic.
--
Why don't Siamese cats come in pairs?