"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Fredxxx wrote:
On 19/06/2016 13:24, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Fredxxx wrote:
And all those countries want a deal with the EU - not the UK on its
own.

You seem to miss the point that a trade deal with the EU is one
conducted with all EU countries individually. Most have the right of
veto, as exemplified by David Cameron's veto on Chinese steel imports.

It would be so much easier to negotiate with just the UK, or even each
EU country in turn.

Carry on believing your fantasies. As they are just that. And sadly,
you'll only find you're wrong after it's too late.

You clearly have no idea how difficult it is for a foreign interest to
negotiate with the EU, where nearly every country within he EU has the
right of veto over negotiations. You are living in cloud cuckoo land.

It seems to be working reasonably well
for the UK at the moment. Within the EU.

There are in fact **** all trade agreements
that matter between the EU and anyone else.

So Britain doesn’t need any if it was outside the EU either.

And even you should have noticed that the US, Canada,
Australia, India, China, Japan do fine outside the EU too.

You want to gamble that throwing all that
away will make things better for the UK.
Without a scrap of evidence.

We have plenty of evidence that the eurozone is
having a hell of a problem and that Britain will be
called on to bail it out if the **** does hit the fan.

Where do you think all these markets are for
our goods who can't buy them at the moment?

Why do you 'think' that those can't continue to do
what they currently trade with Britain outside the EU ?