On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:47:30 +0000, Adrian wrote:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:41:46 -0500, Mark Allread wrote:

At least the most recent Vote Leave lealet has attempted to correct
some impressions.

I wonder if that's the one I just received this morning?

The one that STILL uses the £350m/wk figure?

It does qualify it but you have to read on past the scary red bullet
point first - how many do you think do that?

It also omits to say that whilst some of the money that comes back is
earmarked by EU the great majority of the funding is for the projects
that the Government itself has identified and applied for funding for.

The one that devotes half of one of the four pages to a map showing the
five applicant countries - oh, plus Iraq and Syria highlighted - without
mentioning they're nowhere near joining, and every member will have a
veto anyway?

I forget all the other misrepresentation-verging-on-lies in it, because
it got screwed up and lobbed in the bin in anger.

Ah, yes... It started off with an "OFFICIAL COMMUNICATION" header, and
only mentioned which side was sending it at the very, very end.

Utterly pathetic, and deliberately designed to misinform and mislead

Yes.